![]() On paper, the technology seems reasonable and useful: This is how search looks nowadays, and meta-search engines are far behind. Google feeds me what I need right away and then offers more if I’m not full yet. There is also the People also ask box, helping me to specify what I might be looking for. The first search result is a Wiki page offering crucial bits of information, along with the knowledge graph box on the right. Now, here’s Google’s SERP for the same query: Here’s eTools.ch SERP when I searched for “battle of hastings.” It looks comprehensive, lists the sources used, and the results are even divided by category! If I had the time, I could deeply educate myself in an organized fashion. Let’s take a look at the comparison between these two search result pages, one from a meta-search engine and one from Google, and see how they fare against each other. The story of its demise offers insight into today’s market and a valuable lesson about what we, as users, want from search engines. However, while the heyday of the meta-search engine is long over, the federated search technology continues to be used by travel aggregators and torrent search engines. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |